In The News...

Crime levels...

More crime or less crime, ...It all boils down to the basic concept between "Risk" & "Reward" !!!

If the risk is not worth doing the crime, crime will be less.
If the risk is marginal at best, crime will be greater.

For example...
Little Johnny steals a candy bar and gets caught and the police brought him home & told his parents what happened.

Scenario #1: -Johnny gets a 10 minute time out to think about his actions.

Scenario #2: -Johnny get a beating from his folks and told it'll be twice as worse if he ever does it again.


In scenario #1, there is no real risk other that it took up 10 minutes of Johnny's time. In this case, it demonstrates to Johnny the reward is greater than the risk and will most likely be repeated over & over again.

In scenario #2, the risk was made "painfully" clear to Johnny because he wasn't able to sit for a couple of days and is in fear of ever thinking about repeating his action. In this case , the risk is very clear to Johnny that the reward is just not worth the risk.


If there were laws made AND enforced that address the concept of Risk vs Reward, I believe there would be less stupid people getting off by stupid court systems that have been legislated by stupid politician's !

Trick is dialing in the punishment the specific crime so it's not rendered pointless OR overkill. But simply Just.
 

Attachments

  • 5e9993a9a13b55dc8fc2bfe4b30a8b5f--inspiring-quotes-anonymous.jpg
    5e9993a9a13b55dc8fc2bfe4b30a8b5f--inspiring-quotes-anonymous.jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 2
Interesting points, but the US has the highest prison population (per head of population) in the world.

So how does that fit in with your hypothesis?
 
That's the tip of the iceberg.

Criminal penalties for victimless "crimes" (civil infractions) have ruined untold lives and greatly enhance the number incarcerated.

Courts need to be run as court...not a business for profit.

There needs to be equality of justice as in "equal percentage of loss" in equal crimes. If one is worth $100 and is fined $100 he has lost everything...at $100K, a hundred bucks is no deterrent...100k is , but it is still not as devastating as it is to those with less, because of ease of quicker recovery.

There needs to be a stop to the relatively small civil settlements, and long delays available to those with big resources who can "buy innocence".

protection of executives through corporation needs to come to an end...those who have perpetrated crimes in the name of a company need to be thoroughly punished.

still just the tip...
 
For Davidson, a born-again Christian, the most logical explanation for the conspiracy of the millennium goes like this: "Let's just say there is an adversary, there is a devil, there is a Satan. His whole job would be to try to convince the world that God doesn't exist. He's done an incredible job convincing people with the idea that we're just on a random speck in an infinite universe."

Causation or correlation? Hmm...
 
There is something going very wrong with people.

Sure is.

Total fire ban here and fires burning everywhere and this guy lit one to save his crop. Of course he couldn't control it and they caught him plus saved his house.

Nice little place about an hour from here, less than 200 people. Had to be evacuated. There's another big fire burning just north of there, been burning for a couple of months now and this one has already burnt over 20,000 acres.


images.jpg

75130001_996826084006798_253781727665717248_n.jpg 75402290_996825987340141_4698989629674618880_n.jpg 75496058_996826140673459_5891358639368699904_n.jpg
 
Back
Top