Jed
TreeHouser
Gentlemen: The wife and daughter brought me home some super strong ale tonight (8.4%!!!) so I will TRY to keep this very brief and NOT act like the jack-ass that all of you know me to be.
Here's the deal: I am (no laughing please) giving a company talk in front of our brand-new corporate safety director TOMORROW MORNING, the topic of which is, Hinge Mechanics/ and or/ Stump Forensics (Burnhams' phrase).
I am to discuss alternative measures at the stump, for handling head-leaners, side-leaners, etc., and I actually DON'T REALLY KNOW FOR SURE, why a sizwill would ever be used instead of a normal gapped face.
Here is what I intend to say: "When you have a gap at the hinge, the compression wood is able to flex forward much more readily than if we had sawn-in a traditional pinch. However, when we're dealing with heavy, or even moderate side-leaners, the compression on the far corner (assuming we are cutting on the safe side of the tree) can become so great, that to have a more standard gapped-face could render our hinge prone to torsion failure on the far corner; so, instead we put in a Sizwill, because the contiguous wood-fibers on the far corner will contribute much more compression strength than a gapped face would, although we still retain the advantages of a gap on our tension side."
Do you gentlemen agree with this? If not: why the deuce would anyone saw in a sizwill, if they could just knock-out a normal gapped-face, or German-cut??
Here's the deal: I am (no laughing please) giving a company talk in front of our brand-new corporate safety director TOMORROW MORNING, the topic of which is, Hinge Mechanics/ and or/ Stump Forensics (Burnhams' phrase).
I am to discuss alternative measures at the stump, for handling head-leaners, side-leaners, etc., and I actually DON'T REALLY KNOW FOR SURE, why a sizwill would ever be used instead of a normal gapped face.
Here is what I intend to say: "When you have a gap at the hinge, the compression wood is able to flex forward much more readily than if we had sawn-in a traditional pinch. However, when we're dealing with heavy, or even moderate side-leaners, the compression on the far corner (assuming we are cutting on the safe side of the tree) can become so great, that to have a more standard gapped-face could render our hinge prone to torsion failure on the far corner; so, instead we put in a Sizwill, because the contiguous wood-fibers on the far corner will contribute much more compression strength than a gapped face would, although we still retain the advantages of a gap on our tension side."
Do you gentlemen agree with this? If not: why the deuce would anyone saw in a sizwill, if they could just knock-out a normal gapped-face, or German-cut??
