National Geo Redwoods

  • Thread starter Thread starter gf beranek
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 90
  • Views Views 10K
Stuff like that just happens, unfortunately. If the person(s) doing the research really had a passion for the subject, and were not just doing some job, surely G.F. Beranek's trail blazing would have come up in their research, and had a much deserved place of recognition in the article.

Sorry about that Jerry. :(
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
It's my rant, but it is the truth. The writer of the story may well have written it from the info that was give him. The people that gave him that info omitted important facts.

My grip is not with the writer of the story or the mag editors. It's with the people that supplied the information.

This is only one example where credibility in reporting becomes flawed.
 
To them your just an old logger whose input and climbing techniques are flawed:dur: Blue collar workers will always hold that position in the eyes of the "educated"
 
I think that you have a right to feel slighted...bitter, whatever the term is, in the least it can bug you. Like Darin mentions, the people who are closest to the subject all know better, and there is their uncompromising respect, if it can be of consolation.

You never got wind of an article being written?
 
Yes, Jay. We knew the article was being written and a program aired. In fact, one very cold morning in the spring of 2008, Jer and I went to Montgomery Woods with cameras in tow and the Nat Geo crew was there filming. Jer happened to have a pic in his camera case of the very tree the crew was climbing--taken in 1981, showing the view from the top. Jerry's presence was noticed by the crew and a few of them knew who he was.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #11
If my name was to be used in the article I would have been notified long before it was published.

I do feel slighted, Jay. And, Willey, I'm just an old woods worker that don't knot chit in their eyes.

I never touted to be the first, ever. But the fact remains I was doing reports on the the old growth canopy back in the 70's.

Now I'm ranting only to keep the facts straight. And if the facts are not going to be recognized it is a gross error.
 
It just comes down to the fact that there is writing, and then there is GOOD writing, including the research involved.
 
I never touted to be the first, ever. But the fact remains I was doing reports on the the old growth canopy back in the 70's.

Now I'm ranting only to keep the facts straight. And if the facts are not going to be recognized it is a gross error.

And that's what I was talking about sucking. The readers will be robbed of a accurate and passionate part of the history of these trees.
 
Some of the guys and gals researching the ecosystems in the trees even frown on them being climbed by anyone but scientists studying the trees fearing some one could cause damage... I hope some day they realize tree workers care about it too and are trying to preserve them as well.
 
Spoken like the calm one Squish. :) That's my impression of the Nat Geo crowd. I don't like to lump people together but they don't seem to be able to have an article that doesn't have some message that humans are crapping on their planet. I'm just speculating here anyway.
 
Spoken like the calm one Squish. :) That's my impression of the Nat Geo crowd. I don't like to lump people together but they don't seem to be able to have an article that doesn't have some message that humans are crapping on their planet. I'm just speculating here anyway.


Heh if someone's crapping. There's a damn good chance it's being cleaned up with products produced from logging!!!!:D
 
Maybe even a blessing in disguise. When people start writing about you, sooner or later you get some jackass who has an agenda that they think you will fit perfectly, even if they have to stretch the facts to make their point. It really leaves a bad taste in your mouth about the media, can be rather upsetting, and you may wish that you never allowed yourself to get extended beyond a relatively low profile, even if there is a connection with doing business.

When I was working in the states, I got into a number of woodworking publications, including the cover shot on the big daddy of them. 8)
It tickled my ego for a bit, and brought in some work, but last but not least, some turd comes along wanting to write an article on apprenticeships, using my situation with my laddie as one example, but he wanted to have a difficult relationship to describe, so he made the story about my shop sound like I was abusing my apprentice. I never even considered it a difficult relationship, would not have stood for that in the slightest, nor was I being particularly severe on my apprentice, just par for the course in trying to teach a trade to some young person that loves himself and doesn't have a clue about work discipline. He even went so far as to say in the article that I was having some personal problems, which I still don't have a clue what in hell he was referring to. Even if I was, to say that in a woodworking book, bent me out of shape to no end. So, I wrote the author of the article, among other things telling him how disappointed I was in allowing someone to come into the privacy of my shop for a day, who would then go about construing everything away from the truth for the benefit of adding lines about their subject.....in spite of whatever he may have heard from my apprentice when I may have been out of earshot, or later. He writes me back, says that getting written about is like looking in a mirror, and though you may not like what you see, you are looking at the truth. That's the worst kind of writing, being harmful, and I was livid, and it permanently put me off getting into further publications..

Sorry to have written about myself here, Jerry, just wanted to possibly give you another angle with which to look at the thing. You do yourself great justice positively, the way you yourself write about and show your activities in the forest. No doubt that further opportunities will arise.
 
Back
Top