Wall of Shame: Wannabe Experts

  • Thread starter Thread starter bonner1040
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 1K
  • Views Views 152K
Sitting too hard back, you would destroy a redwood wedge before you would get it to sink. So. Still no.
Or did you mean "redhead"
And still, hard head would serve better or magnesium IMO
The monster thin steel wedges they used to tip the redwoods before jacks.

I’m not dumb enough to think you could wedge a tree with essentially cedar. I’ve tried euc and it doesn’t hold up.
 
Multi-prong approach.

I have wedged some big trees. A bottle jack, if you don't have a real tree jack is a whole lotta 'go over there" with plenty of tight wedges. I've only jacked big trees with Silvey jacks.

He called for more rope force which went from whole lotta (insufficient) pull to zero when it broke.

2 more (good rope-angle) ropes on two more machines would have also been a good way.

5 long wedges can do a lotta lifting.

10, twice as much.




How much backweight does it seem to have had?
 
Wedges aren’t that effective in trees with large canopy spreads. You might get the log to tip but the back weight can balance out a lot of wedge.

My SOP for big pull trees is to cut some of the back weight off first. They had the gear on site it wouldn’t have taken that much more time to rig out the back weight so they could destroy what ever pavement later.

And leaving a good hinge is probably a solid idea.
 
Back
Top