They aren't CAT motors, they are Perkins, and they suck big time, in my direct, hands on, personal experience. I have a friend that went through several ASV's in attempting to purchase one, before he got one that actually worked correctly.

The Perkins/CAT are cold blooded, loud, and expensive to work on. We had to have some warranty work done on a CAT engine, and it took six months and a huge hassle to fix a defective exhaust manifold. The undercarriage on the ASV machines is very smooth, but also very expensive to maintain. I rate the ASV machines as rudimentary in appointment, and annoying overall. I would compare ALL machines to see the cost of running per operating hour. You Will be paying a large chunk of change for maintenance to keep a tracked machine running, in addition to the substantially higher initial purchase cost. That is not to say it is not worth it, just be prepared for it.
I am a strong supporter of CASE skid loaders. We have been running them here since the early seventies, and I have been running them since I was 8. We retired the last one at 10,500 hours. My favorite all time skid loader is the CASE 1845C, it has the smoothest hydrostatic drive of any that I have operated. The Bobcats also seem to be good machines, just not as smooth. I ran a T300 track machine, and it was a pretty sweet machine, however it did go mental and eat up a trailer.:roll: The T300 would pick up trees with 60"+ root balls with ease, but would also slid down icy driveways with them.


It ran the 44" spade well, but wouldn't lift the 50". It has been replaced with a Takeuchi, of some sort, which is working out well. They also have a CASE, whichever is the biggest tracked machine they make, I don't know much about it. If it were me, I'd look at the CASE, or the T300/T330. Kubota is also about to spring a skid loader on the market, but I don't know when.