Search results for query: *

@Frankie Where's the patent on that LogOx™? There might actually be one, cause the patent office doesn't do it's job, but if I were particularly interested in selling a version, I'd be more than happy to go to court with them to determine how 'non-obvious'(a patent requirement) a 90° handle...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cant_hook#Description a 90° added handle is a trivial addition. It's a cant hook.

That's called a cant hook, and the design's been around since at least the 19th century. Which patent do you think is relevant?

I've spent a good amount of time reading about trademark/copyright/patent law. It's one of my esoteric hobbies since it directly relates to my use of computers. You should follow your own suggestion. Dumbass...

ftfy

Money has nothing to do with copyright, trademark, and patent law.

OP could copyright the specific cad files for his designs, but there's nothing stopping anyone from making a clean room replication. Also, no official trademarks could be used from saw manufacturers; eg using a Stihl logo in sales materials, or making a full color replica using official logos...

Welcome! They're kinda cool. I like that they're identifiable, and not just generic saws. An echo 2511t would be a good addition I think. They have a pretty good following, and a distinctive form, so it would be different from the other saws.