Search results for query: *

Another reason for the definition, I suppose, is legally discerning what a landscaper can work on vs an arborist. This is applicable to regions requiring licenses. Insurance (from what I’ve seen) sometimes insure a company to work on plant life but can limit height.

I think per the ISA study guide, the 10’ was to show how a palm would be called a tree instead of a grass.

The ISA cert says 10’. I’m sure there’s variables country and worldwide. Just thought it interesting.

Anyone know a/the textbook regulation height to consider a species a tree? I just learned it and found it interesting and wondered why I hadn’t thought about it before. It’s based on capability to attain this height, therefore a sapling of a tree species still qualifies.