Search results for query: *

You are correct there, my bad. I was trying to explain how the volatiles are consumed first, which is true for all solid fuels, and that process is pyrolysis because the oxygen level on the surface of the fuel is too low. If I'm not mistaken, the part of the flame is actually called the zone of...

Yup, i forgot to mention mills that already utilize it, and have for years. But they all are geared for the most amount of electricity possible, which makes sense because we still have so much fossil fuel use. But by shifting them to carbon negative by increasing the amount of fuel in, they...

Because it's more expensive than just burning coal at the moment. Coal is mined on a level that unless you've actually seen the amounts involved, you can't fathom the efficiency. The efficiency is due to the fact that it is a multi billion dollar industry dating back to the dawn of the...

Lol it sounds worse than it is. The process is actually so simple you can build one in your back yard out of a 55 gallon drum that makes charcoal using a small amount of wood to start the reaction. The rest of the energy for the process is supplied by the volatiles burned off, resulting in 50...

Not exactly. I'm pretty sure Paul Cox brought it up once before, but it's using charcoal to improve the soil. Most powerplants in the world are/ we're originally designed for coal. They are huge expensive pieces of infrastructure, and most are designed to burn coal by gasification in fluidized...

Lol we were bound to find something!

Now that i can agree on, although i think waste gasification with terra preta storage will be the easiest and most economical, which is ironically very old technology.

Funny, i have a YouTube playlist that empirically shows that baby does indeed got back. https://youtu.be/_JphDdGV2TU

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/canada-arctic-glacial-melts-reveal-land-not-seen-in-more-than-40000-years-2019-1 This should clear it up.

Do you have any source for this claim? I bet no. All i know is that when virtually all of scientists who study this stuff agree, with no reservation, that humans are causing climate change, i have to accept their expertise. In fact, it's been scientific theory and knowledge since at least the...