Search results for query: *

  1. Marc-Antoine

    Beranek's Coos Bay felling cut vs. Burnham's

    In your scheme, there's too much woood left in the midle. The global geometry after the preparing cuts is almost the same as the round trunk, too few gain to prevent the failure. Your cut 2 and 3 should be a good amount deeper than that for working as a CB, like less than 1/3 left. In the...
  2. Marc-Antoine

    Beranek's Coos Bay felling cut vs. Burnham's

    Not so slight modification as the triangle cut is inverted compared to this one. You cut two notches on the front's sides, under the lean, meeting at the middle, so the pointy part of the triangle left uncut indicates the falling direction (= the heavy lean here). Then the backcut, fast of course.
  3. Marc-Antoine

    Beranek's Coos Bay felling cut vs. Burnham's

    I don't remember having such an issue with The Book. Maybe because I flied over too quickly and my english was too poor to see the subtleties. That's some years ago. I have definitively to come at it again.
  4. Marc-Antoine

    Beranek's Coos Bay felling cut vs. Burnham's

    I wrote like that too, with some nearly endless sentences and packing in it as much infos as I could. Conciseness you know. It isn't easy to do properly and it takes a lot of time. Tough, that gave me a lot of troubles at the university, as my supervisor kept to correct continuously my reports...
Back
Top