Search results for query: *

It is very different here I guess. We need to work every day. A full time logger get over 2000hrs/year

1200hrs is just a tad over half a year for the guy's running full time here. Larger saws is mostly for felling and bucking. X-torq will never work well in felling. It has not the umpf needed and if they get it to run right they loose the purpose of it.

How many hrs you got on it now last it was serviced and hooked up, Willard? Problem is in the design of the engine. 576 they cook here as well, not as many as 575, but still.. 372 X-Torq they go kaboom as well pretty early. The smaller saws just as bad. I have still to see a X-Torq with the...

The 560 series will have external clutch if it is to be in same family. If it is to have a internal, crank and case will have to be different and thus not same saw. I don't see the point in having larger cc on a saw that is not good as it is... Better to can the project, cut the losts and do...

By out I mean on sale for all to have. That usually mean it comes with a news bulletin, WM, Parts list and sales brochure as well so saw and parts can be ordered.

Autotune 372 was tested, but I don't think it ever got out...

Autotune 572xp I don't know of as it is not a Husqvarna idea, Perhaps Husqvarna USA, but nothing i heard of here thast was to be out on market. I don't hear all and can have missed it completely... There was talk about naming the 372X-Torq 572 to make it clear it was a different saw, but as far...

I doubt it will be out with autotune. 572 is a dream saw, i never dreamed it would have AT. Side note. 372 has been tested with autotune carb. I doubt it got to be a test series even.

It is already here, it is just not renamed it still is called 372xp and is also X-torq. The 576 is a couple cc bigger and should be the replacement, but... 372 with X-torq has issues just as the rest of the X-Torq's...