Search results for query: *

Because he can't, I assume.

:thumbup:

That's wrong, Butch. We see work pics from you in the rotator every day.

Now I know I'm on the right path...when I agree with Stig and then Graeme chimes in with an attaboy. Gotta be right :).

What works best for any of us, is what works best. Antediluvian...how many of us dumb loggers would use, or even recognize such a word? Hoooah, Stig my brother. :D

I'm not sure what you are saying re the Humboldt...but my description of method will work with either conventional or Humboldt style faces.

:D

I'm perhaps a lazy rascal...even on relatively level ground, I'd keep to one side of the tree and do what I know how to do, more often than not. All that walking around in a duck squat tires me out :D. And the darn saws are heavy! Especially after I got old :). Unlike my fine friends Stig...

Thank you, Fi...though I rather doubt you'd have much trouble seeing the picture I tried to paint even if I wasn't so effin' articulate :D.

Thanks. I like it. Though some other instructor somewhere most likely has used it before it came to me. Describes what you see with stump forensics perfectly. A few decades of schooling baby chainsaw operators helped me develop both language to talk about the end goals, and refine my own...

This is fairly easy, Murph. Here's a really straightforward method from big tree country. Let's assume no radically difficult leans. Set the horizontal cut from your side, right where you want the hinge to be, nose of your bar buried. Then pull the saw, set the dogs out front at the edge of...