Search results for query: *

To me, a resistograph would be better for quantifying the extent of the cavity/decay/structural defect, but it costs a heck of a lot more. Then again, pay to play. There is also the conflict of interest (perceived/real/potential) from the consulting arborist recommending removal and giving...

It's hard to judge depth/size from a camera without having something to scale/give the image context. Identifying decay organisms is a valid point I'd say, although the market for that here is, as yet, unrealized.

What diagnosis can be gained by the camera? I get that it's cheap, but what is it going to tell you?