I believe that is a matter of perspective...consider Pando in Utah, or the 9000 year old spruce (root system) in Norway. Indefinitely from a geological perspective, perhaps not, but perhaps when compared to a human's lifespan.
I think our job is to present our clients with options with regards to the maintenance of the trees we are called upon to observe. I would hope that we can, as an industry, see past our lust for sawdust and fear of litigation to at least present a balanced viewpoint of all the options.
I liked the presentation, and feel there are some valid points. Does the tree present a significant hazard with regards to total or component failure with a high likelihood of resultant damage? Does not appear to be the case, but it is tough to tell without hands on observation. I agree with the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.