Search results for query: *

Huh? :?

I bet you meant that tongue in cheek, but it wouldn't surprise me a bit if there wasn't a bit of truth to that. Now factor in the ratio that will be willing to drop the bucks for one.

Ahh, for a second there I was thinking it was a tad over-complicated, ha!

I've done it, it works, although the bend radius ain't the best thing for the bullrope. And it's not a "lowering" device, it's a false crotch.

Same here, except I use the hell outta my porty.

So four pulleys are involved? GRCS? I'd love to know the % of tree companies with one of those. I bet it's like 3%.

Nah, I'm just a Rocker! :rockon: :lol:

I see you made it - Welcome to the TreeHouse, Rob! :beer:

Nope, sorry.

Isn't that a zip line?

But WHY?

You wouldn't do that blocking down a stem.

Not at all what I was doing.

You know, that's IT! Now that I remember, (and I just called the guy to discuss it) my groundie DID have the porty directly under the pulley. The Cure has been found!!! :rockon: No diagram's necessary. It's just two pulleys at the same level (more or less), but spaced a foot or so apart. This...

Hell, those pics are have taught me a lot

Well crap, why don't they show that in any of the groovy Sherrill pics? I've never seen them use two pulleys.

Yes, and yes.

The other day I was roping some med-large logs using a false crotch and pulley. The rope held, but the outer cover broke. It seemed to me (and this is a first) that the log hit the standing line of the bullrope, smashing it against the tree. Of course, I didn't really see it so I don't really...