Search results for query: *

Chaps I don't know anything about except the ones Oregon sell here and they are same as pants. I use these and know torq is no matter. If you ever had a saw with high torq in your hands you should see it too. Fiber is pulled from pants and tangle in clutch cover causing a pretty fast halt...

Too much torque is BS! Good argument to push product but not correct from safety aspect. It has to do with rpm's and layers on nylon string. It gets packed in saw regardless of torque. Pants are tested with 12hp saw and should handle at least 21m/sek

If you use normal chainsaw pants approved up to 21m/sek the chain speed, you'll be just as well actually even better off than with a petrol saw as chain speed is limited to 20m/sek on battery saws. Not gas saws were you can get bigger rims and high rpm out of and close to 25m/sek pretty easy.

Why would it be useless on a electric motor?

No, not very far I have about 3,5 hour up there. Factory is interesting, museum as well. You are most welcome anytime! I get a couple visits from BC sometimes. I think Mike Acres is coming in August...

I know that a 439 perform better than 536 in wood once it is started and run. Pellenc also outperformed 536. 150C-E also outperformed the 536. 020Big outperformed all of them. When we got the saw I called up to Husqvarna and wondered if I got the right stuff to test. They said yes but sent...

If you compare two saws like this it say's very little when you look after facts. There is a lot we don't know and cant see.... I can make a video were my Partner 351 beat a 372. It won't say much either...

That is soft wood. I have Partner 351's that cut better than that Stihl 150. Doesn't say much as a comparison.

Hahaha. That tells something about the 150 as well!