Search results for query: *

Well, like I posted earlier, I'll not tie up Stephen's thread any more. Sorry to have pissed you off somehow...thanks for your input.

:lol:

Thanks for the feedback. Sorry to hijack your thread Stephen. I know how that's looked down upon here.;)

I'm not against saving some trees if it's the better solution. If someone fixes the brakes on my car or the roof on my house they dang well are responsible for a reasonable amount of time! If you cable, then go back and inspect every so often, aren't you renewing responsibility until the next...

Thanks, I see what your both saying. i don't mess with it myself, and there is more behind my question than I care to get into here. Just looking for some input.

How so? By inspecting and cabling don't you imply safety and durability of the tree and take on responsibility for it?

How does this affect liability and cost of insurance? Once you cable a tree wouldn't any failure would be on you?