Search results for query: *

Earth needs CO2 for plants and oxy production. Best go look up some real science

He said carbon

Agreed.

YVW. To be carbon neutral (or close to it), nuclear can not be ignored and will have to make up a portion of the energy provided by everything else where it at least falls short.. Now, if we can succeed at fusion reactors, this will also solve some of our issues. Fusion is close. But still not...

Sorry, I am trying to find the 200 year statement, but it might have been one I looked through. In the last article, few hundred was stated. Of the dangerous waste that only makes up a small percentage of the total. "Perceived health risks Since the dawn of the civil nuclear power industry...

Read the articles I put up B. Down to more like 200

Indeed

https://world-nuclear.org/nuclear-essentials/what-is-nuclear-waste-and-what-do-we-do-with-it.aspx

https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/5-fast-facts-about-spent-nuclear-fuel#:~:text=That's%20right!,%2C%20such%20as%20France%2C%20do. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/02/nuclear-waste-us-could-power-the-us-for-100-years.html

The tech has advanced enough to help with that. They have found ways to use the waste in several stages.